After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are reviving these types of systems. Out of lie recognition tools analyzed at the edge to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technology is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/how-to-pace-yourself-in-online-learning how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to browse these systems and to go after their legal right for proper protection.
It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from accessing the channels of cover. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, in which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects so, who are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
Ý kiến của bạn